Negative Method Yield

Naked Capitalism

Negative yield is reactionary. When, for example, in the late 19th Century, economies of scale were built out to provide goods cheap enough the masses could afford, the “naked capitalist” was, in his mind, creating order from free-market chaos. Like we see in nature, the property that emerges is positive. Even more valuable is to identify the product of consolidating industry and markets as yielding to the objective ontology (the intended identity) of a natural existence, which is a philosophical construction that supports the arbitrage argument.

Consolidation of industry and markets is still the model used to pre-tend the ontology of an on-demand, free-market existence. Since capitalism exists to resist the chaos of on-demand forces, it can only pretend to yield to its tendencies, yielding instead to the intendency of “the risk” being avoided.

The result is massive accumulation of debt–negative yield. The “big risk” Geithner refers to in “Stress Test” must be constantly managed in the futures (“tested” by method, yielding to the “stress”) if the risk is to be avoided, which by default would undress capitalism and reveal its natural, naked identity.

Advertisements

About griffithlighton

musician-composer, artist, writer, philosopher and political economist (M.A.)
This entry was posted in Political-Economy and Philosophy and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s