Finding the Right Combination

Hydrogen and Oxygen in the right combination yields to water every time by default. It’s the law. Settled science.

Since H and O are elemental (fully reduced) we say that water derives from being combined, which is a temporal process (that naturally suggests there is a reason why). How water forms is easily demonstrated by experi-mental science (by mental experience), which is an inductive, temporal process. Why it forms is more theoretical (a product of the mind), which is a deductive, temporal process. Both processes are based on time. We say that “when” hydrogen and oxygen combine, “it” creates water, presuming that water did not exist before H and O, which (deductively) seems unreasonable (an improbable or improper attribution) because H and O are elemental, probably existing H20 over time by combination.

(Keep in mind, saying that elements are fully reduced is based on THE LAW–the legitimate propriety–of numbers. Specifically, the periodic table. If there is any chaos in this clearly defined order it is the temporal process that occupies space over time.)

Trying to describe why something works is likely to bias the conclusion. There is a tendency to bias the method to yield confirmation of the hypothesis, which is validation (deduction) and not verification (induction). In other words, describing “why” things work likely induces the evidence, resulting in a false (psycho-pathological) identity.

(Nobody wants to be wrong, but if it is a matter of demonstrating power–who’s the boss–it is everything to be right no matter how wrong you are, if only to satisfy your self. It’s the Iron Law.)

The reason a free market works is because of the passive resistance that naturally aggresses the risk in the marketplace. Risk is passive (fully deduced in priority) until aggressively resisted (induced). Aggressing the passive resistance on demand (which does not create the risk but verifiably resists it) naturally forms the utility of a proper (legitimately conforming) attribution.

Free-market mechanics allows for an inductive process that measures risk on demand in a non-catastrophic proportion. The reason derivative contracts can be used to confiscate property on command (utilizing the force and legitimacy of natural law in the form of cyclical trends) is because the power to demand its resistance (the risk) is too consolidated. The natural result is a more aggressive than passive demand dimension. To conform to THE LAW, the risk goes gamma, yielding to a commonly divisible detriment (an organized dysfunctional psychopathy) created on demand.

By means of its consolidation, the risk is induced to perform on demand. It conforms to command expectations just like conservatives say it always has and always will, verifying the Iron Law.

Advocating the free market with the formation of natural monopolies, conservatives argue they know the right combination; but we keep dialing it up and getting the wrong number!

If we need liquidity, what’s the right combination to create it on demand by default?

Advertisements

About griffithlighton

musician-composer, artist, writer, philosopher and political economist (M.A.)
This entry was posted in Political-Economy and Philosophy and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s