When passive goes massive, what’s the resistance?
Objectively, resisting natural identity is futile. Why resist, Ayn Rand argued. When the passive goes massive, there is nothing to fight over. There is no struggle, just the objective reality of our natural existence.
At the time Ayn Rand was writing–providing the hip alternative to progressivism–we were fighting communism in Vietnam. Going massive-passive, there would be no need to force them into their natural identity, right?
As it turned out (the Elite School would predict), the Vietnamese discovered their natural identity. Now, by signing the TPP, the people can form labor unions, and the rate of profit (like Marx predicted) naturally declines, because it’s a free market, after all.
Notice the apparent random but factorial determination of the sequence acting to progressively occupy space over time.
(Notice that, historically, once the event has occurred–once the factorial has been discovered–it always will have been what it was discovered to be.)