Debating the Logic of Resistance

Senator Sanders expressed a Progressive identity.

Hillary Clinton expressed an Objectivist identity.

If you want Objectivism–the philosophy of big bankers–vote for Hillary Clinton.

Modeling economic risk for default is not a crime. It’s a function of deconsolidation. Glass-Steagall separates banking functions, deconsolidating the risk so that it does not cause a great recession.

There is no reason to oppose deconsolidation unless, of course, operationalizing risk for default in late order, which is hard to prosecute as having criminal intent, is the objective.

Sorry, but resisting Glass-Steagall (technical deconsolidation of the risk Senator Warren refers to as “conflict of interest”) “causes the inequity” Mrs. Clinton says she is opposed to.

Advertisements

About griffithlighton

musician-composer, artist, writer, philosopher and political economist (M.A.)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s