The Perverse Incentive

Economists often talk about the perverse incentive, like when wealth becomes so consolidated that banks tend to lend only to a small number of people (low liquidity), referred to as concentration risk.

Reversing the perversity is a function of diversity. Supposedly, lenders (people who have consolidated most of the money, who then extend credit to keep the economy from accelerating into a catastrophic risk proportion, known as systemic risk) avoid the so-called unsystematic credit risk (concentration risk) by diversifying the borrower pool.

The first thing to notice is that diversifying the credit risk does not reduce the risk. It makes it more diverse (changing the incentive), which is a natural hedge against probable default. Second, this is what Sanders says he will do in priority (which is not anti-business, but perversely pro-business); and third–he will actually do it, without intending to reinvent the problem in a TBTF (gamma-risk) dimension (perversely argued to be otherwise unavoidable).

Advertisements

About griffithlighton

musician-composer, artist, writer, philosopher and political economist (M.A.)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s