Gaming the Risk Dimension

Risk has a mechanical, geometric shape. A mathematical model to describe the natural mechanics of game theory, created by John Nash, for example, is essentially the formula used to price financial options and futures contracts. (See articles by griffithlighton on derivatives markets, risk dimension, and formulation of the risk.)

Political scientists and economists use natural models to predict probable outcomes. These models are based on systematic incentives, which can be geometrically described with predictive utility.

A political scientist can look at Kim Jung Il and say that the systematic incentive is nuclear deterence. Nuclear physics, geometrically, is also a political-risk problem, which (like Kant said) has a naturally moral dimension, integral to knowing what objective reality actually is (with a transactional interpretation existing — addjected — on demand).

If there is a preemptive measure against N. Korea it will be because its autocratic leader demanded it. The natural identity of nuclear weapons is the deterence value, but there is still an on-demand dimension, with some assembly required, naturally existing in a moral, spatial dimension, which Objectivists describe as “arbitrary” and “delusional.”

Nature objectively is what it is, and if you don’t care, it will make you!

concept art by griffith lighton

Advertisements

About griffithlighton

musician-composer, artist, writer, philosopher and political economist (M.A.)
This entry was posted in Political-Economy and Philosophy, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s